TESTIMONY BY MARY MCGARR BEFORE MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS STATE LEGISLATURE:
Gentlemen,
Thank you for coming to listen.
The majority of information this afternoon centers on
various concerns most of us have with regard to the Texas
Essential Knowledge and Skills and the overall process leading
up to this culminating activity.
The concerns that we have center on
the viability of this document as it currently exists and how we
got to this point in time.
My remarks focus on
questions many of us have regarding the
straightforwardness of this process, the use of taxpayer
dollars, the honesty of those in charge of our central education
agency and its satellite regional centers, the removal of all
vestiges of academics from the TEKS, and the overall integrity
of this process.
The presentation you will hear in a
moment highlights the most important area of concern for all of
us:
the reading
portion of the language arts TEKS.
This critical area is paramount for with a careful study,
and a transfer of applications, one can see the overall weakness
of the
entire TEKS effort.
However, I urge you to review
specifically, not only this area but all others, for the entire
document is flawed.
The element of common sense has
been missing since the beginnings of this restructured education
effort.
For five or
six years, many of us have watched helplessly as the central
education agency in this state railroaded an effort for
educational restructuring which removes all vestiges of
academics from the curriculum.
Initially almost $700,000 was spent to train Texas
Education Agency personnel in the manipulative methods of the
Delphi technique.
Most of us were not aware of those efforts at the time they
occurred.
My
interest was piqued when I responded to a press release in the
Katy Times
and
attended a training session for prospective “Real World” team
leaders.
I was
appalled at what I saw at this meeting.
The trainer,
Bill
Daggett, led a session of pure manipulation.
Supposedly, following that summer in 1993, 1000 of these
“real world forums” were held around the state with 25,500
participants (and the implication was that these participants
were mostly parents)
who
told the state what they thought students “needed to know and be
able to do so they might compete in the ‘real world’ of the 21st
Century.”
I believe
I have proof that only 375 actual meetings were held with maybe
9,000 participants, and quoting Cynthia Levinson (the director
of the project) “more than half” of those in attendance were
educators and 15% were from “business, industry, and labor.”
Using happy math, she is also quoted as saying that
“40% were parents.”
Applied math then tells us that 24
participants at each of the meetings in only one-third of our
school districts actually had any input.
Continuing with Ms. Levinson’s figures, at least 12 of
the 24 were educators and four were business representatives,
leaving maybe eight parents in each of 375 (not 1,061) school
districts who supposedly decided the thrust of public education
in Texas!
I have burdened you with this
minutia because it is important for you to see that this process
has never been what it was purported to be.
You as legislators were fooled as was the public, and I
think you should be offended by that.
Using that questionable base,
writing teams were appointed by Commissioner Meno and left in
place by Commissioner Moses.
Their makeup reflected the bias of the Texas Education
Agency and their work has been manipulated from the outset.
I also believe that the TEKS that
will
really be used were already composed a
long time ago by members of the TEA, because as a school
board member I was given a draft copy of some of them ( for
Algebra I) on December 7, 1993, long before the “real world
needs” results were tabulated.
That having been said, I trust you
can understand my great alarm over this entire process.
Any worthwhile endeavor does not begin in deceit and
fraud that are perpetrated upon the public.
You must act quickly in a bipartisan manner to stop this process until it can be rectified. The citizens of Texas do not deserve to have their children’s education dumbed down for political reasons.