LOCAL MEDIA COVERAGE OF THE 2014 BOND ELECTION:

 

Be sure you read and watch the local media coverage of the BOND:

 

Channel 26 did a second program highlighting the reasons to NOT vote for the bond.  Unfortunately their spot was still more about the PRO bond stance instead of the advertised opposition stance.  What's new?

 

3rd try for Katy I.S.D to get stadium bond passed

 

 

http://www.myfoxhouston.com/clip/10526332/katy-isd-announces-bond-referendum-to-meet-growing-enrollment-demands

 

Read today's (8/27/14) Chronicle front page article about both Democrats and Republicans pointing out how ridiculous the STAAR tests are, taking the Commissioner of Education to task for them,  and pointing out how they don't really measure student achievement.  Same thing I've been saying for years about the State's testing program.  Why did we all get a better education when there wasn't a TEA? and their stupid tests? I would give you the URL for the article, but the Chronicle has evidently bowed to pressure and won't put articles about education matters with their URL's up for about a week so the public can't comment on them on line. They don't care what we think!  The story will appear on line in a week or so and by then everyone will have forgotten about it.  That's by design! Be sure you read Donna Garner's column from yesterday about why students are unable to do well on the STAAR test. It's under Education/Testing on this web site. The reason shouldn't surprise you, but it will.

 

Go here and vote in this KTRH poll:  http://www.ktrh.com/main.html

 

If you mistakenly believed the superintendent when he suggested that KISD students are doing great academically, go to http://georgescottreports.com/alton-fraileys-opening-school-day-email-continues-public-educations-practice-of-some-of-the-academic-truth-some-of-the-time-to-some-of-the-people-and-all-of-the-truth-none-of-the-time/ and read Mr. Scott's  column today!

 

 

Alton Frailey’s Opening School Day Email Continues Public Education’s Practice Of Some Of The Academic Truth, Some Of The Time, To Some Of The People And All Of The Truth None Of The Time

Posted: 26 Aug 2014 06:24 AM PDT

On the 2014 STAAR Algebra I test last year, just 17% of the 664 Morton Ranch High School students that took it achieved the “Recommended” academic passing standard the Texas Education Agency has defined as the grade level standard it wants to achieve on behalf of Texas students at some point in the indeterminate future. […]

 

 The Houston Chronicle (Saturday August 23, 2014)in a front page story addresses bond issues.

 

http://www.houstonchronicle.com/neighborhood/katy/news/article/New-Katy-stadium-plan-revives-bond-battle-5706994.php


  There are comments on this one including one (three because they don't allow enough space) from me!
 

Speaking of facts, here are some corrections and additions for this article:

1. The "signs" do not criticize Reverend Carmichael.

2. To say that they do is untrue and not logical.

3. The 2013 Bond Referendum last November suggested that they would build a 14,000 seat stadium, not a 16,000 seat stadium. No one has ever put a 16,000 seat stadium on a bond referendum in KISD. Once passed the District can build a stadium as big as they want as they are not tied to the proposal placed before the voters before the election.

4. The committee had 127 people on it, not 200. Depending on which press release or letter one sees, 800, 600 or 500 people applied, 247 or 227 were selected, 128 were put on the real committee, 119 were put on the "B" Team Committee that got no say. Who knows how many were left when some discovered they were being Delphied by a hired Delphier.

5. The 2013 Bond Referendum, after being pushed mightily by the district, drummed up a small committee after the fact that met twice in July of 2013.

6. Part of the cost for the stadium does not appear in the 2014 bond because $750,000 +or- has already been paid to PBK, the architect, for design drawings. That fee was supposed to be paid out of the 2013 bond funds which didn't materialize.

7. Saying that the stadium "only makes up 6 percent of the bond's total cost--much less than in the 2013 proposal..." is duplicitous. The 2013 bond didn't include new schools and repairs.

8. The district may be "expecting 3,000 students this fall," and they may well come, but it will be the first time since 2008 that there have been that many.

9. The signs that were put out "did not make strategic sense" because no one connected with an organized group seems to have put them out. They were just someone expressing an opinion. I think that's called free speech, and anyone can do it.

9. Rice University political scientists have been known to give KISD a bum steer previously. The District paid handsomely for one of them in 2006. That bond was defeated too.

11. What probably defeated the November Bond in 2013 were the signs that said, "No buses, no bonds!" We still don't have any buses for our youngest and most vulnerable children who have to now (and for the last two years) walk in the street to get to their elementary schools. And never mind that all of us who live within .5 miles of an elementary school had the value of our homes decreased whether we have children in school or not.

12. The architect (PBK) who has already been paid by the District for a stadium design is the same firm that designed Allen Stadium in Dallas which is having to be partially torn down in order to fix the flaws and defects that appeared within a few months of its completion. Can anyone explain why KISD is keeping this architect? PBK also has four architects that have been recently fined by the Texas Board of Architectural Examiners. They also have to attend two hours of "ethics training." (The complaint against them was signed by 107 other architects with standing.) Why would KISD still be using such a firm?

13. This is the first we've heard of the "rhetoric [being] from a group of people that wanted to be on the committee but didn't want to be in on the process, leaving when we started the negotiation process... There was blood on the floor when it was done." Please tell us more about those people. Sounds like they saw something reporters are missing.

Mary McGarr

Katy ISD School Board Trustee

1991-1996


Another Chronicle article:

 

http://www.chron.com/default/article/Tempers-boil-as-Katy-stadium-vote-closes-in-5701431.php#comments

 

 

The August 21 edition of Community Extra in the Houston Chronicle addresses bond issues.

 

Channel 11 News on Sunday, August 17, 2014 ran a clip on these signs saying "not everyone in Katy was backing the bond" or something to that effect.  Now that clip is nowhere to be found! 

 

And the August 18, 2014 Chronicle also has a story:  http://blog.chron.com/k12zone/2014/08/critics-take-to-church-to-protest-katy-isd-bond-plan/#25970101=0

 

Channel 11 News on Monday, August 18, 2014 mistakenly announced that Katy ISD passed the bond! What they meant to say was that the KISD Board voted to put the bond proposal for $748 Million plus interest on the ballot in November.

http://www.khou.com/story/news/local/2014/08/18/katy-isd-board-passes-748-million-bond-for-november-election/14269231/

 

The Chronicle this morning has a CITY/STATE front page article on the bond;  http://www.chron.com/default/article/Katy-board-puts-748-million-bond-on-ballot-5696901.php   AND they are taking comments...

 

On September 10 appeared on the Political Chicken Blogspot an article entitled "Katy ISD:  Got Debt?

http://thepoliticalchicken.blogspot.com/2014/09/katy-isd-got-debt.html  This one is also taking comments.