HOUSTON CHRONICLE REPORT ON TEC FINE:

 

Katy ISD trustee Joe Adams pays civil fine for violations of election code

Citizens watchdog group filed complaint

By HELEN ERIKSEN CHRONICLE CORRESPONDENT

Nov. 17, 2008, 5:35PM

The Texas Ethics Commission has fined Katy Independent School District trustee Joe Adams $500 after an investigation into allegations of campaign financing irregularities during the May 12, 2007 school board election.

The probe was initiated after Mary McGarr, who is a member of a school watchdog group, filed a complaint with the commission in February accusing Adams of failing to make the required state finance disclosures.

McGarr’s complaint alleged that Adams failed to properly disclose political contributions and political expenditures on his “exceeded $500 limit” report and eight-day pre-election report for the May 2007 election,20and on his July 2007 semiannual report.

The Texas Ethics Commission met on Oct. 13 and determined that there was credible evidence of violations of the election code. The commission issued a final order on Nov. 12 after Adams agreed to pay the civil fine.

The commission found that Adams “failed to include the date for an in-kind contribution of $80 for ‘letters, cards and stamps’ and failed to include the date for a political expenditure of $1,549.06 for campaign signs on his original July 2007 semiannual report.”

The commission also wrote that “evidence indicates that the respondent failed to disclose the proper dates for political expenditures on his July 2007 semiannual report” and “failed to properly disclose the total amount of political contributions maintained as of the last day of the reporting period” on his “exceeded $500 limit” report.

In a Nov. 13 letter-to-the-editor, Adams said he reviewed the records with his wife and campaign treasurer Donna Adams after being contacted by the commission.

“We took immediate action and filed corrected reports,” Adams said in the letter. “The errors involved inadvertent omission of dates and reporting dates of some expenditures. We incurred some expenses and did not know the exact amount (e.g., printing, signs, and a newspaper ad) during the eight days before the campaign.”

While Adams said he disagreed with the findings, he said he has paid the civil penalty. “. . . to pursue the matter further would be costly and time-consuming with trips to Austin and legal fees,” he added.

“We have chosen to pay this civil assessment in full resolution of any issues relative to my campaign finance reports in order to get this procedural matter behind us so I can focus my attention on continuing to be the best board member I can be,” said Adams, who has been trustee since 1989.

The Katy Citizen Watchdogs said in a Nov. 17 press release that the group contacted Adams in December about not filing paperwork properly, but that Adams had said his reports were filed in accordance with the law.

“The Watchdogs had wished to give trustee Adams every opportunity to correct his errors and avoid a complaint,” co-founder Chris Cottrell said in the release.

The complete ethics report is available on the TEC Web site at http://www.ethics.state .tx.us/sworncomp/2008/280272.pdf

AverageGuy wrote:

I don't know about the fuzzy math, but it is a poor accounting practice. I agree with your assertion that it is a bad example for the kiddos, however.
.
Easy credit, seemingly unlimited tax revenues and in this case influence money (election funds) allow people to spend without any regard to budget.

11/19/2008 7:08:49 AM

KadeesMom wrote:

It's that darn district "fuzzy math" again. KISD is known for it. See, the example is set from the top and the "spend now and we'll worry about reporting it and paying for it later" attitude is what we're left with. To the children, of course. " Three generations of debt and growing", INDEED.
This wasn't the first time he has done something during an election that didn't quite pass the smell test. During the very last District VIPS breakfast to ever be held at the Omni on Eldridge, he was handing out his yard signs from the back of his truck as the volunteers were leaving. I have pictures. He looked ridiculous and desperate.
Desperate to win at any costs because why??? There needs to be term limits on how long someone can sit as SBOT. With a clause for immediate dismissal if you are caught violating the law. He should at least step up and be a man about it and apologize. But don't hold your breath!!!!!!

11/18/2008 1:25:10 PM

MRM17 wrote:

That's what they call the non-competitive bid process - "we'll hire you for sure, just tell us how much it costs us later and we'll put it in the next bond issue".
But don't worry, as long as the administration tells them it's OK or needs to be done, no investigation or questioning is done by the rubber-stamp BOT. Welcome to 3 generations of debt...and growing!

11/18/2008 8:58:22 AM

AverageGuy wrote:

"We incurred some expenses and did not know the exact amount"
Is that the same approach this person uses when overseeing the KISD budget?

11/18/2008 6:55:00 AM