HOW A KATY ISD SCHOOL BOARD HIRED THE SUPERINTENDENT IN 1995:

 

HOW A KATY ISD SCHOOL BOARD HIRED ONE OF ITS SUPERINTENDENTS -

February 20, 2006

(Revised March 9, 2011)

By Mary McGarr 

Katy ISD has an interesting track record when it comes to superintendents.  When I moved here, the superintendent was Gordon Brown.  Mr. Brown ruled the school district with an iron hand.  Everything was geared toward letting the interlopers from the suburbs pay for whatever those who lived in the City of Katy thought they needed in their Katy schools.  It was a scenario not unlike that played out whenever the suburbs intrude on what has been for years a sleepy little town.  [As one who has now lived in the District for thirty years, I see how the folks in the City of Katy felt when new people came in and tried to tell them how to run things. There are two sides to every story.] 

The Board was pretty much controlled by local Katy citizens because the suburbians weren’t organized at the ballot box well enough to make changes.  School board elections are to this day always held on the same day as City of Katy elections so that the electorate can be directed to the school election ballot box if necessary. 

As we all know, Katy High School athletics are primary to academic educations, so that matter took precedence.  When upstart Taylor High School came along and started to have  a winning football team, Mayde Creek High School was built long before it was needed so the population at Taylor could be decimated. [Twelve hundred students in 9 through 12th grades in 1987-88.] Then when Taylor still managed to go farther one year in post season playoffs than Katy High School (small population and all), all of a sudden the next year the Taylor winning football coach, Donnie Laurence, was gone!  It was the same scenario that played out when Cinco Ranch High School started getting too good.  But I digress. 

Superintendent Brown was good at keeping the locals happy, and they were pleased with him. [In retrospect, he was a good superintendent, I thought.] Unfortunately for him, he created his own demise, and he and his new wife, the former Assistant Superintendent, left for Huntsville where they happily reside.  It cost the school district many hundreds of thousands of dollars for his exit. 

Next up, after some interesting board elections, was the hiring of Linda Woodward.  Dr. Woodward was a very nice lady, who I believe really tried to do her job.  Her mistake, in my opinion,  was telling people what she thought they wanted to hear, and it’s only 10 miles between both ends of the district, so that didn't work out too well.  In an effort to save her job, I ran a petition drive to secure Single Member Districts, and actually acquired the necessary signatures to cause the change, but mysteriously my best friend’s car was stolen with a large number of the petitions in it.  Stranger still is the fact that the car was found unscathed in a scuzzy downtown Houston  neighborhood, with nothing missing but the petitions!  Think this stuff isn’t serious? 

After the school board ran off Dr. Woodward (and she got paid handsomely for her exit too, and I was of the opinion that she deserved the pay-off), the board started a new search. I had lived in the Katy school district for a while by then, and I recall going to one of those put-up meetings where they ask for “parental input.”  I gave them mine, but it did little good. [The head hunter said he was happy to talk to anyone about the hiring process.  I gave him my name and number, but he never called.  A few years later as a member of the School Board which was interviewing superintendent headhunters, this same guy came to interview for the job.  Much to the chagrin of my fellow board  members, I reminded him of his offer and his inability to follow through when I had asked him to call me.  He hemmed and hawed, and then I said, "Came back to bite you, didn't it?"  You had to have been there, but it was pretty funny!]

Soon it was announced that Dr. Hugh Hayes had been named as the superintendent.  The announcement in one of the papers piqued my interest when it said that this man, according to someone who knew him in Odessa, had a “bad temper.”  What a strange comment, I thought at the time.  Dr. Hayes came to town, made some cosmetic changes and settled in.  He was obviously here to do the bidding of the Texas Education Agency and spent much of his time in Austin.  Skip Meno, who was brought in from upstate New York by Governor Ann Richards to implement the Outcome Based Education/School to Work agenda that was coming from the Federal Government, sent instructions out to the local school districts, and Dr. Hayes, in my opinion, complied with most all of them. 

In the mean time, I got myself elected to the school board, and started to be a thorn in his side, countering all his "school to work" initiatives with some of my own which were more basic and traditional in scope.  Dr. Hayes didn’t like my opposition, but he was not able to stop me from saying what I wanted to say. I really tried to work with him and explain the reasons for my opposition, but he was obviously convinced about the reform agenda. As I have often said, my opposition to these matters is about actions and words and ideas.  I feel that some of the people that push those things are misguided, and I cannot understand how they would support such things that ostensibly take liberty and freedom away from their fellow citizens and which so clearly are detrimental to students.  It's always been a puzzle to me.

In the summer of 1993, Dr. Hayes made a huge mistake when he inserted the Texas Penal Code definition for "public lewdness" into the Discipline Management Plan that is distributed to all students on the first day of school.  Parents and students are required to sign a statement that assures that they have read the document.  Parents were outraged at the inclusion of the rather unsavory sexual language that was included in that definition.  Dr. Hayes tried for a week or so to blame the inclusion on the Board, but when I brought forth my draft copy which is what the Board had been given to approve and the Penal code definition wasn‘t in it, the rest of the Board realized that we had NOT approved the inclusion of the questionable language, and Dr. Hayes was stuck with sole responsibility for his lack of good judgment. [You'd think after having gone through that embarrassing moment, being chastised by the Editorial Board at the Houston Chronicle and being the laughing stock of Houston, the school board would thoroughly review the DMP every year, but they don't!] 

After that, Superintendent Hayes decided that he needed to move on.  Because of the circumstances, the Board did not have to buy out this superintendent’s contract, and he left the district. 

At that time, the Board began to interview prospective head hunters. The process took a while.  One week when no matters regarding this search were scheduled, I went to Dallas with my husband on his business trip.  I notified the Board president that I would be gone, and asked him specifically and as a courtesy to me NOT to schedule a board meeting while I was gone.  Of course, the minute I left town, he scheduled a meeting to pick the headhunter and failed to notify me. The Board picked Bob Thompson for the job.  Bob Thompson is/was an education teacher at Lamar Tech.  He moonlighted on the side as a superintendent headhunter. [He actually gets a huge grant from the State of Texas to run his "superintendents' academy."]  He had a stable of candidates that he touted around the state. He had just been paid to find the Alief superintendent.  He was not the headhunter I thought we should get, and the Board president denied me my opportunity for input with his actions.  Mr. Thompson was pretty incompetent, in my opinion, as he was not able to even write the prospectus in a satisfactory manner. It had to be re-written by the Board before we could use it. 

Of more importance is the fact that I discovered much later that Bob Thompson was the chairman of the committee formed by Skip Meno, the Commissioner of Education and head of the TEA which implemented the School to Work agenda in Texas.  He was in the thick of things and now he was out making sure the “right kind” of superintendents were  placed in one of the twelve targeted school districts where School to Work was going to be tried out on children unbeknownst to their parents. 

Mr. Thompson got lots of quality applicants from all over the place, but none of them got past him, and I only found out about them after the decision to hire Leonard Merrell had already been made. 

What Mr. Thompson brought to the Board were four candidates who were, in my opinion, ill-suited to carry out the wishes of the Board or the citizens of Katy. 

Before the candidates were solicited, however, the Board sought public input.  At the time, I truly believed that the Board was genuinely trying to do the right thing.  Naďve as I was, I would never have believed that the whole process of engaging the public was phony. I was wrong. We held meeting after meeting, and parents came out in droves. 

An old clipping from the Katy Times on October 30,1994 describes what a group of people picked by the Board offered up as the “top 10 qualities for a superintendent”:  “insures good communication with parents and news media, accessibility and open access at the district and campus level, deals with student population growth and a controlled building plan, tries to eliminate large class sizes (such as 35 students in one class in secondary schools), supports safe environments and safety, has high expectations for students and administrators, opposes federal and state mandates, Emphasizes non-athletic more than athletic activities, emphasizes basic education from elementary to secondary, will dismantle Outcome Based Education Activities, and supports only three levels of administration middle management.” 

Several more meetings were held, and here are the items picked by Bob Thompson to include in his brochure advertising the open position: 

“The following criteria have been adopted by the Board to serve as guidelines in selection of the new superintendent. 

The new superintendent should be [and notice that all the OBE buzz words are in this list!]: 

*A person who can administer a challenging, accountability-based academic program. 

*A visible, accessible person who effectively communicates with district personnel, the community, state and national decision makers, and all other publics who have a stake in or impact on the district. 

*A person proficient in involving the community in decisions that affect and enhance the content, quality, standards, and direction of the district’s academic, vocational and extra-curricular programs.  

*A person who has comprehensive management abilities regarding business, staffing, and planning functions in a large, rapidly-growing district. 

*A strong leader who will take a stand on issues of importance to a child’s education and who will establish high standards of academic excellence and discipline. 

*A person capable of creating a climate of cooperation within the district. 

*Must be certifiable as a superintendent in Texas.  A doctorate is preferred but not required.  Experience as superintendent or assistant superintendent is preferred. 

Conditions of employment: 

Salary:  $100,000 - $140,000 range 

Fringe Benefits:   Negotiable 

Contract:  Term length is negotiable 

Travel:  In-district:  Negotiable

Out-of-district: All reasonable expenses 

Professional Dues:  Reasonable fees and dues 

Residence:  Must reside in district 

Moving Expenses:  Negotiable 

Medical:  Must pass physical and psychological exams prior to employment and an annual physical thereafter.