MY EFFORTS AFTER LEAVING THE BOARD TO INFORM THE PUBLIC:
When I resigned from the Katy school board a year early
in 1996, I spent the next few months addressing the Board in the
Open Forum part of the Regular School Board meeting. The
press coverage of my efforts was not what I wanted, but it was
expected.
After a few months of frustration with the bad press
coverage of School Board meetings and especially my presentations, I sent the following letter
to Stephanie Johnson, the This Week
correspondent at the time and to the
Houston Chronicle Editorial Board. As we all know,
those people have no interest in actual happenings in the west
end of Houston. This episode centered on the SAT scores and
their presentation to the Board.
Dear Ms. Johnson:
Although your reporting of KISD board activities and my
interaction with them has been for the most part over time
fairly accurate, I must protest the statements made by you in
your article that appears on September 11, 1996 in the "This
Week" section of the Chronicle under the headline "KISD:
TEA reason district does not use spelling books."
Since you attended the August 26 board meeting, you had full
opportunity to hear my exact words with reference to the SAT
issue. I have also offered in the past to discuss with you
at any time my participation in school district matters, so if
you had a question you knew you were free to call me. To
print Joe Kimmel's remarks "He said McGarr's Aug. 26 allegation
that the Scholastic Aptitude [sic] Test was re-centered so
scores would look better and please the Department of
Education--which she said is 'aligned with liberal-leaning
boards [sic no end quotation mark] doesn't make sense." is
irresponsible journalism. Mr. Kimmel would like to
discredit all of my remarks so that the public thinks I am the
one who does not understand the issues, when in fact it is Mr.
Kimmel who does not understand.
Two points need to be made. First Mr. Kimmel in his
paranoia thought that I was accusing the KISD board of being
liberal-leaning. I made no such statement. Second,
Mr. Kimmel obviously was unable to understand the connection
that I made between the un-taxed foundations run by
liberal-leaning boards of directors, the Department of Education
and the Katy school board. His inability to understand is
indicative of his problem.
Since you evidently missed it the first time, here is a copy of
my remarks:
"Members of the Board, Dr. Merrell,
One of your presentations tonight is on the 1996 SAT scores.
The SAT scores were the
last definitive measurement of academic progress.
Unfortunately that statement is no longer true. Why will I
not be surprised if the SAT scores for the KISD Class of 1996
are up? As you listen to the presentation to be made
shortly, will you be formulating questions so you will
understand these scores? Are the scores really up or is
this just another exercise in funny numbers?
Will you be given any figures about the rank of Texas with
regard to KISD's scores being hailed as better than the state
average? That's an important fact to know. Over the
years we have been pretty much at the bottom as a state among
the 22 states that use the SAT for college entrance. And
when KISD is touted as being better than the national average
will you stop to think about all the low achieving students who
are included in that national average?
Will you receive a clear and accurate explanation of how the
test was changed in 1981, 1993, and now again in 1996?
Will you ask why the test was re-centered so that while only 25
students nationally in 1993-94 on all seven tests given to that
year's class scored a perfect 1600, this year 137 kids who took
the April 1995 test alone made a "perfect" 1600? Will you ask
about that? Do you understand what re-centering means?
You deserve a clear explanation so you can determine for
yourselves how bad these scores are!
Will you think to ask why re-centering was necessary? Can
it have anything to do with the fact that the College Board is
funded by the Department of Education, and the DOE has a vested
interest in making it look like students are doing better since
most of them are receiving an OBE education? The College
Board has joined with the National Council of Teachers of
Mathematics, the Aetna Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Sid
Richardson Foundation and other foundations with liberal
thinking boards that are already well known for their
restructured education endorsements and funding. Have you
ever been told these facts? Can it be that the DOE saw how
realignment of the TAAS-type tests that states give has made the
states' scores look good, and that the same process would make
SAT test takers look good? Will it be explained to you
that this realignment process is simply a way to dumb down the
tests so they match the dumbed down curriculum?
Since there has been already a great deal of discussion about
the lower 25% of each KISD Senior class, will you hear about
them? Are they still scoring on average less than 700
(now 820)? Is that not a serious concern for this district?
And what about all the students who did not even bother to take
the SAT? Are you going to just forget about them?
When you add that percentage to the percentage who cannot score
above 700 (now 820,) about one third to one half of KISD
students are not being prepared for any kind of post graduate
education. Are you not alarmed by that fact? Does it
not bother you that the College Board has decided to make
students look better, without actually doing anything but make
it look like they are achieving
better scores?
When you are told that "more students" took the SAT in KISD as
an excuse for lower scores, will you ask how many more or who
those students were? Also please do not accept without
question that it is slower students who are entering the pool.
In KISD it is probably smarter students!
At no time since I have been attending board meetings has anyone
ever bothered to point out the changes that were made in 1993 to
the SAT. Among these changes are allowing the use of a
calculator (test takers don't have to think), giving more time
to answer fewer questions (used to be 85 questions in 60
minutes, now it's 78 questions in 75 minutes), eliminating the
analogy section, adding a writing sample that is graded
subjectively, (adjusted for gender and racial bias, whatever
that means), testing for problem solving skills, testing
vocabulary within the context of the reading passage and testing
for applied math abilities. As we are seeing in the
regular curriculum, less emphasis on the acquisition of
knowledge is the keynote of this test.
Better colleges will still be taking the top 2% of our students,
but now they will just have a more difficult time figuring out
who they are. In the meantime, this test is a fraud,
because students and their parents will think they have done
better than they have. But then, isn't that the purpose of
all this stuff?"
(There should be a tape recording of the August board meeting at
the KSID Administration Building to verify the accuracy of my
statement.)
My presentations to the board since I resigned from it are
admittedly hard-hitting. I believe I have a
responsibility, that I was unable to carry out as a member of
the board, to expose the flawed and faulty presentations that
are made to the board as well as other erroneous information
that is given to them, regardless of the source, and which
emanates from them. By law, the school board is supposed
to receive and to give out factual, clear presentations on
student achievement, and any unfavorable information is also
supposed to be imparted. That eventuality does not occur
in KISD. The board is given sugar-coated information so
that everything appears wonderful, and thus the public is also
misled. I think that practice is harmful to our students,
and I will continue to present factual counter information and
prod the board to do the job they were elected to do. For
you to describe my monthly remarks as an effort to "use open
forum sessions to publicly attack the board" is irresponsible on
your part to say the least. My remarks have never
constituted an "attack on the board," but, are rather
statements made to show that their actions are faulty.
Re-read my presentation and please tell me which part of it is
an "attack" on the local school board. Each month I have
presented factual information to show the public that this board
is operating in a manner that is not conducive to allowing
students of this school district to receive a sound, academic
education. Your indication of an "attack" implies that my
information is not factual. Please tell me which bit of
information has not been factual.
You might also want to read the definition of
attack in your favorite dictionary.
For you to proclaim that I am attacking the board when I am only
exercising my rights as a private citizen to question what they
do, is unfair. I have not noticed your proclaiming that
any of the many other parents who repeatedly appear before the
board are attacking the board! I certainly did not believe
that the Houston Chronicle's
editorial board was attacking the
KISD board when they accused them a few years back of voting in
executive session. Their vigilance allowed for a
correction of an action that Ken Burton and I had protested when
it occurred. The Chronicle was just doing a responsible job of
reporting the facts much as I have been doing. My efforts
would be helped if YOU were as vigilant. You should be
reading the monthly expense reports, comparing this year's TAAS
and SAT scores with last year's and with other similar school
districts' scores, questioning the employment of so many
administrators (and the fact that they are being imported
wholesale from the east side of town), giving some space to the
phonics vs. whole language debate as are other local newspapers,
following up on the many charges made by parents at the monthly
open forum part of the board meeting and so on
ad infinitum.
If I were questioning the credibility of anyone with my remarks
on the SAT scores, it was the administrator who continues to
bring this slanted information to the board. Mr. Burton
and I are simply trying to open the eyes of the public and to
force the current board to do what they are supposed to be
doing (provide oversight of the superintendent!) Are you against open discussion by citizens about
public issues?
Might I suggest that my worthy goal would be much easier if you
too could ask pertinent questions of the board members and stop
acting like a door mat and letting them use you to bolster their
silly egos? I would imagine that somewhere in your
education, you learned how to ask questions that would lead to
the truth. May I suggest that you try to remember that
technique? Our students will be much better off if you
could. In response to my remarks (above) that
approximately a third of the KISD high school seniors are unable to score
above 700 (now 820) on the re-centered version of the SAT, Larry
Moore later in the meeting, in an effort to cover up the poor
academic instruction of this district, asked the presenter if
these low scores meant that these students were failures
(implying, of course, that I was calling the students failures)!
Mr. Moore, as usual, missed the point: the students are
not failures; it is the academic education that is being
provided by KISD and endorsed by the school board, including Mr.
Moore, that is the failure. You were sitting there
when Mr. Moore made that statement. How could you not
comment on his effort to twist my statement? That is
irresponsible reporting, in my opinion. I am unable to
understand why you always allow the board members to respond to
my remarks, but I am never allowed the same opportunity.
Do you not wish to be fair in your reporting?
Obviously Mr. Kimmel is feeling paranoid, else he would not have
made such an egregious mistake of having believed that he heard the
KISD board labeled as liberal-leaning when no such statement by
me was made. My use of that term was used solely with
regard to the boards of directors of certain un-taxed
foundations that are helping to fund these ridiculous
restructured education efforts. Mr. Kimmel can reveal his
inability to understand the spoken word if he likes. You,
however, have practiced flawed journalism in allowing his
erroneous remarks to stand uncorrected in your article and by
defaming my efforts to improve the education of children in KISD
schools.
I am requesting that you print a retraction and a correction of
your errors immediately.
Mary McGarr
[Obviously that request was wishful thinking on my part.
However, Ms. Johnson soon disappeared, for whatever reason, from
the pages of the This Week section
of the Chronicle and was replaced by
someone else. And yes, I have since indicated that our school
board is liberal in its political beliefs, but in 1996, I don't
think that was true. I simply think they were ignorant of
the restructured education initiatives going on all over
America. Even though Joe Adams is still the only one of the group that is
still hanging on, some of them are even yet STILL ignorant of the
restructured education initiatives that are going on all over America, and which at this point
in time are pretty much very securely in place!]