Seven candidates filed to run in the 2014 Katy ISD School Board Election as of February 28th, the filing deadline.

 

The seven candidates include incumbent Bill Proctor opposed by Ashley Vann; incumbent Charles Terry Huckaby opposed by Courtney Doyle and Jennifer Camero, and incumbent Henry Dibrell opposed by Cyndi Lawrence. The winners were Ashley Vann, Courtney Doyle and Henry Dibrell.

 

Be sure and go to the heading Parent Teacher Association on this web site, and among other things be sure to read the article about "The Connections between the PTA and the NEA."  The PTA is closely aligned with the National Education Association (NEA) which is a labor union and has been for decades.  Most people who pay PTA dues don't have a clue that about half their dues go to the State and National PTA's and those groups have an agenda that is closely tied to the NEA. The National PTA supports Obama's  Common Core curriculum. In my opinion the PTA is all about teachers but not students--and certainly not parents. Most people at the local schools won't know this, but the PTA presidents should know it, and both of these ladies are in that category. (I have always supported PTO's whose dues stay at the local schools.  Katy ISD has a few PTO's left, but they have dwindled in number.) 

 

The PTA has just put two more members on the Katy School Board.  We should all be concerned about that!

 

**************************************************************************************************************

 

ELECTION RESULTS FOR 2014 SCHOOL BOARD ELECTION:

 

Bill Proctor  1,285        Ashley Vann      2,620

 

Terry Huckaby   1,023      Jennifer Camero     363      Courtney Doyle   2,446

 

Henry Dibrell   2,461       Cyndi Lawrence    1,430

 

**************************************************************************************************************

What's sad about the vote in this election is that of the 92,763 registered voters in the Katy Independent School District, only 3,900 +/- of them voted in the school board election!  So 4,000 voters decide for the 89,000 rest of us how our schools will be!

**************************************************************************************************************

 

I'm posting this story from 2011, shortly after the 2011 election just to remind everyone how disappointing it was for all of us who supported Huckaby, Dibrell and Proctor when they cast this vote on "public school finance."  Evidently a law suit was filed.  Anyone remember how it turned out?  What happened to "our" $65,000 I wonder?

http://instantnewskaty.com/2011/10/26/29214

Katy ISD Trustees Vote to Join Lawsuit Against State Over Public Education Funding

Katy ISD is the latest in a growing list of school districts across the state to join in a lawsuit to force the Texas Legislature to make changes in public education funding.

During Monday’s school board meeting, trustees voted unanimously to engage the services of the law firm of Thompson & Horton to represent the district in the lawsuit.

Thompson & Horton is the school district’s contract law firm and will also represent numerous other school districts across the state in the litigation.

David Thompson, a partner in the firm, told trustees he expects more than half the school districts in the state to eventually join in the suit in an effort to force legislators to reform the method used to fund public education.

He also the legislature was expecting the lawsuit.

“I think it is one of those things where everyone regrets that it is necessary to do, but I am going to tell you very candidly from my regular conversations with members of the Legislature both the (Texas) House and the Senate, it’s not unexpected,” Thompson said.

The pivotal issue, according to Thompson, is that the Texas Constitution mandates the state provide “adequate” funding for education. He also said this will be the sixth time school districts have sued the state over its funding mechanism and “the state has prevailed only one time” in the earlier lawsuits.

Trustee Terry Huckaby asked Thompson how this suit might solve the problem when previous litigation has not.

“It seems everybody’s real fast to sue, but nobody’s got a plan to solve the problem,” Huckaby said. “Instead of the negatives, when are we going to solve the problem?”

Thompson agreed that, despite the earlier lawsuits, state education funding was “still a mess” but this time the plaintiffs plan to ask the court to retain jurisdiction to enforce the outcome. He also said while the overall funding problem had not yet been solved, earlier litigation “has made our (school) system better.”

The attorney also said he shared Huckaby’s frustration, but the ultimate responsibility for developing a working funding solution rested with the Texas Legislature.

“We need to honestly recognize the cost of the high standards we are establishing for all kids and then we need to have a funding system that’s actually tied to what it is we are trying to accomplish, instead of treating those as two completely unrelated decisions,” Thompson said.

The cost of taking part in the lawsuit is based on a formula of $1 per student based on the district’s average daily attendance. The cost to the distinct will be capped at $65,000.

 

16 Comments

  1. Mikel says:

    The only one’s that will make any money off of this deal will be the lawyers..It will be a windfall for them.

  2. Just Wondering2 says:

    I don’t get it. The law firm expects hundreds of districts to join the suit and some to sit it out. Seems to me if the lawsuit is successful ALL districts will participate in the outcome.

    Why hire them at this late date as other districts have already ponied up the money???

    Do you have any idea how much money this firm will be collecting if they charge a buck a head for the student population statewide, millions. How hard can this suit be???

    Terry is right, we taxpayers, hire an attorney with our local tax dollars to sue the State (US) who in turn will increase our STATE taxes to pay their attorney and the extra money we want sent to our school district.

    Just how is it we come out on top of this one, we pay someone to sue ourselves. Go figure.

  3. Mary McGarr says:

    It is unbelievable that participation in this suit was agreed to by a unanimous vote!

    Seems that it only took five months for all three new members to succumb to the mindless drivel of our change agent superintendent!

    All of you know from last spring that the legislature isn’t the one spending all the money–it’s the school districts! The school districts already use up most of the State’s tax dollars. Last Spring they didn’t receive as much money as they hoped, but they never do. There is no end or limit to the amount that they will tell us they need or that they can spend. The Legislature could give them twice what they gave them, and they would spend it and ask for more.

    With people who apparently can’t think for themselves on our Board, what do we all expect?

    For Heaven’s sakes, will someone who is smart enough to take them on, who truly understands the issues, and who is a Conservative Republican, please step up to the plate and run for the Katy school board!

  4. Ross Raymond says:

    Maybe one of them will request a reconsideration of the matter and get our money back?

    For this sum we can hire a teacher and an aide for a full school year. Maybe buy a school bus, stock up one of the libraries, who knows what use we might have for these funds? Paying lawyers should not be at the top of the “to do ” list.

  5. Truth B Told says:

    Truth is that the district was sitting on $180 MILLION in its local rainy day fund, while planning on firing teachers. So what will this district achieve by being in this lawsuit?

    Truth is the old school board of Snyder, Duhon, Crockett, Howard, Shaw, Fox and ‘Robo Joe’ Adams gave the admin staff a 35% raise, have 11 superintendents, while Frailey-Harris were publicly telling us that the district needed to fire 500 teachers to make the financial ends meet because the state was not giving the district whatever amount they thought they needed. Chicken Little was present at the school board meetings within the 8 that were sitting in front of us.

    Truth is it was all a scam and shame by the top administrators. Crockett kept saying things like don’t make the district look bad, yet she was part of the scam plan.

    Any wonder why the students, parents, teachers, taxpayers, and voters were upset about what the Katy school district was doing at the top! Truth is we still have not forgotten the truth and their lack of leadership for our students and teaching staff members.

    Truth is the district has a weak case and the attorney will get lots of our tax money because this board agreed to participate in the case. What solution would they want to happen? They never said nor would answer Dr. Proctor’s final results questions.

    Truth is they are wasting more of our tax money.

  6. mndannen@aol.com says:

    From A.D. Muller
    Wow,
    The board found $65,000 to blow on a lawsuit. “Really”. After the lawyer felt the pain and frustration of Huckaby, the board voted to make the pettifogger happy. It appears that Mr. Frailey has conjured up Kool-Aid, that only lemmings could drink.

    Maybe we should bring Snyder, Duhon, and Crockett back. We knew they were snakes in the beginning.

  7. westsidebill says:

    What a freaking WASTE OF TIME! (excuse my English!)

    Woopity-freaking-doo!!!!

    To say I’m disappointed in the new board members with this vote is a vast understatement.

  8. determinedmom says:

    For all that watch the finances of the district. I believe when Marcy Canday was speaking on the foundation she said that they were going to have payroll deductions for the KISD Foundation? Did anyone else hear this. I was not sure I heard that correctly. Thank you